Skip to main content

CHRISTIAN WOMEN AND THE VEIL IN PRAYER — Chapter 5

English
🇵🇭 Tagalog
⟵ Previous Next ⟶

Christian Women and the Veil in Prayer (Ch. 5)

1 Corinthians 11:2-16

Chapter 5

APOLOGETIC DEFENSE

The teaching of the head covering has not only been questioned by brethren but mocked or dismissed by the world. Feminism views it as oppression. Denominationalism often calls it non-essential. Skeptics call it outdated. Yet when we allow Scripture to interpret Scripture, and apply careful reasoning, the case stands unshakable.

5.1 The Appeal to Adam and Eve

Whenever Scripture anchors a doctrine in Adam and Eve, it declares it to be timeless:

·     Marriage — Jesus: “From the beginning it was not so” (Matt. 19:4–6).

·     Women’s silence in the church — Paul: “For Adam was first formed, then Eve” (1 Tim. 2:13).

·     Head covering — Paul: “For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man” (1 Cor. 11:8).

If the veil is cultural, then marriage and women’s silence are cultural also. To accept one as permanent while dismissing the other as temporary is inconsistent and dishonest.

5.2 Jesus’ Reasoning Matches Paul’s

Some suggest Paul was stricter than Jesus. But notice how their reasoning matches:

·          Jesus: Appeals to Genesis to prove permanence of marriage.

·          Paul: Appeals to Genesis to prove permanence of headship and covering.

Both apply creation order as binding across all ages. Thus, Paul is not innovating but applying the same logic as Christ.

5.3 Angels as Witnesses

Why mention angels? Because worship is not just horizontal but vertical. Angels are observers of divine order in the assembly (1 Cor. 4:9; Heb. 1:14).

·     Angels transcend all culture.

·     Their presence makes the covering a cosmic testimony.

·     To dismiss the covering as cultural ignores the heavenly dimension of worship.

5.4 The Universality of Church Practice

Paul closes with: “We have no such custom, neither the churches of God” (v.16).

·        This was not Corinth-only.

·        Paul appeals to all congregations.

·        Apostolic teaching is consistent everywhere (1 Cor. 4:17).

If the veil were optional or cultural, why insist that every church followed it?

5.5 Addressing Feminist Objections

Modern feminism rejects any visible symbol of submission. Yet Scripture calls submission beautiful, not oppressive.

·     Submission reflects Christ Himself, who submitted to the Father (1 Cor. 11:3; Phil. 2:6–8).

·     The veil is not a symbol of inferiority, but of divine order.

·     To reject it on feminist grounds is to reject the humility of Christ.

5.6 Addressing Denominational Objections

Many denominations dismiss the veil, claiming: “It’s not essential to salvation.”

·     True, the veil alone does not save. But neither does baptism, if divorced from faith.

·     The issue is obedience. Jesus said: “If ye love me, keep my commandments” (John 14:15).

·     The covering reveals whether we honor apostolic teaching or dismiss it as cultural.

5.7 Addressing Skeptical Objections

Skeptics often say: “This is outdated.” But by what standard?

·     If “outdated” means culturally unpopular, then baptism, weekly communion, and singing-only worship are outdated too.

·     God’s Word is not bound by culture (Ps. 119:89).

·     To call the veil outdated is to accuse God’s eternal Word of being temporary, which undermines all doctrine.

5.8 The Logical Consistency

If the veil is cultural:

·     Marriage permanence (Matt. 19) is cultural.

·     Women’s silence (1 Tim. 2) is cultural.

·     Headship itself (1 Cor. 11:3) is cultural.

But no one who denies the veil dares to consistently apply that reasoning. Selective dismissal betrays prejudice, not exegesis.

5.9 The Broader Witness

The veil aligns with the broader biblical theme of visible obedience:

·     Noah building the ark (Gen. 6:22).

·     Israel keeping the Passover with blood on the door (Exod. 12:13).

·     Baptism as visible burial and resurrection with Christ (Rom. 6:3–4).

God has always used physical acts to manifest spiritual truths. The veil fits this consistent pattern.

5.10 Conclusion of Defense

The apologetic case is clear:

·     Adam and Eve anchor the command in creation.

·     Jesus and Paul reason the same way.

·     Angels witness worship beyond culture.

·     The churches universally practiced it.

·     Feminist, denominational, and skeptical objections all fail when tested by Scripture.

The veil stands not as a relic of culture but as a living testimony of divine order in worship.

Readers may share, print, teach, or repost these articles if unaltered, intent preserved, not sold or used commercially, and with a clear link back to this blog.

#ChristianWomen #VeilInPrayer #HeadCovering #1Corinthians11 #BibleDoctrine #ChurchPractice #CreationOrder #ObedienceToGod #CristianongBabae #BeloSaPanalangin

Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Support This Work
🔙 Back to Table of Contents

Cristianong Kababaihan at ang Belo sa Panalangin (Ch. 5)

1 Corinto 11:2-16

Kabanata 5

PAGTATANGGOL SA ARAL

Ang pagtuturo tungkol sa belo ay hindi lamang kinukuwestiyon ng ilan sa mga kapatid kundi tinatawanan at tinatanggihan din ng sanlibutan. Para sa mga feminist, ito raw ay pang-aapi. Para sa mga denominasyon, ito raw ay hindi mahalaga. Para sa mga mapangduda, ito raw ay luma na at wala nang halaga. Ngunit kung hayaan nating ang Kasulatan ang magpaliwanag sa sarili nito, at suriin ito nang maingat, makikita natin na ang aral para sa paggamit ng belo sa pananalangin ng mga kababaihang Kristiyano ay matatag at hindi matinag.

5.1 Ang Pagbanggit kay Adan at Eva

Tuwing ang Kasulatan ay inuugnay ang isang aral kay Adan at Eva, ito ay palatandaan na ang aral na iyon ay walang hanggan:

·        Pag-aasawa — Sabi ni Jesus: “Mula pa sa pasimula ay hindi gayon” (Mat. 19:4–6).

·        Katahimikan ng babae sa iglesia — Sabi ni Pablo: “Sapagkat si Adan ang unang nilalang, at pagkatapos si Eva” (1 Tim. 2:13).

·        Belo — Sabi ni Pablo: “Sapagkat ang lalaki ay hindi sa babae, kundi ang babae ay sa lalaki” (1 Cor. 11:8).

Kung ang belo ay panlupa at panandalian lamang, dapat ganun din ang pag-aasawa at ang katahimikan ng babae sa iglesia. Ang pagtanggap sa isa bilang permanente, ngunit ang isa ay tinatanggihan bilang pansamantala, ay hindi tapat at hindi tama.

5.2 Ang Paliwanag ni Jesus at ni Pablo ay Magkatulad

May ilan na nagsasabing mas mahigpit daw si Pablo kaysa kay Jesus. Ngunit pansinin kung paanong magkatulad ang kanilang batayan:

·        Si Jesus: Gumamit ng Genesis upang patunayan na ang kasal ay permanente.

·        Si Pablo: Gumamit din ng Genesis upang patunayan na ang pagkakasunud-sunod ng pang-ulo at ang pagsusuot ng belo ay permanente.

Pareho nilang ginamit ang kaayusan ng paglalang bilang batayan sa lahat ng panahon. Hindi nagdadagdag si Pablo ng bagong aral, kundi ipinatutupad ang parehong lohika na ginamit ni Cristo.

5.3 Ang mga Anghel bilang Saksi

Bakit binanggit ang mga anghel? Sapagkat ang pagsamba ay hindi lamang nakikita ng tao kundi pati ng langit. Ang mga anghel ay mga tagasaksi ng kaayusan ng Diyos sa pagtitipon (1 Cor. 4:9; Heb. 1:14).

·        Ang mga anghel ay hindi nasasaklaw ng kultura.

·        Ang kanilang presensya, na binanggit ni Pablo, ay gumagawa sa belo bilang patotoo sa buong kalangitan.

·        Ang pagturing sa belo bilang pangkultura lamang ay pagwawalang-bahala sa aspeto ng pagiging makalangit ng pagsamba.

5.4 Ang Pagkakaisa ng Lahat ng Iglesia

Nagtapos si Pablo sa ganito: “walang gayong ugali kami, ni ang iglesia man ng Dios.” (v. 16).

·        Hindi ito para sa Corinto lamang.

·        Umapela si Pablo sa lahat ng mga iglesia.

·        Ang aral ng mga apostol ay pareho saanman (1 Cor. 4:17).

Kung ang belo ay opsyonal o pangkultura lamang, bakit ipinatutupad ito sa lahat ng iglesia?

5.5 Pagtugon sa Pagtutol ng Feminismo

Tinatanggihan ng modernong feminismo ang anumang simbolo ng pagpapasakop. Ngunit sa Kasulatan, ang pagpapasakop ay maganda at hindi pang-aapi.

·        Si Cristo mismo ay nagpasakop sa Ama (1 Cor. 11:3; Fil. 2:6–8).

·        Ang belo ay hindi tanda ng pagiging mababa, kundi ng kaayusan ng Diyos.

·        Ang pagtanggi rito dahil sa pananaw ng feminismo ay pagtanggi rin sa pagpapakumbaba ni Cristo.

5.6 Pagtugon sa Pagtutol ng mga Denominasyon

Maraming denominasyon ang nagsasabing: “Hindi naman ito mahalaga sa kaligtasan.”

·        Totoo, hindi ang belo ang tuwirang nagliligtas. Ngunit gayundin, ang bautismo ay walang saysay kung hiwalay sa pananampalataya.

·        Ang usapin dito ay pagtalima (pagsunod). Sabi ni Jesus: “Kung ako’y inyong iniibig, ay tutuparin ninyo ang aking mga utos” (Juan 14:15).

·        Ang belo ay sumusubok kung tunay nating iginagalang ang aral ng mga apostol o kung binabalewala natin ito bilang pangkultura lamang.

5.7 Pagtugon sa Pagtutol ng mga Mapangduda

Sinasabi ng ilan: “Luma na ito.” Ngunit ano ang batayan?

·        Kung ang “luma” ay ibig sabihin ay hindi na uso sa kultura, ganun din ang bautismo, lingguhang Hapunan ng Panginoon, at awitan lamang sa pagsamba.

·        Ang Salita ng Diyos ay hindi nababago ng panahon (Awit 119:89).

·        Ang pagsasabing ang belo ay lipas na ay parang pagsasabing ang Salita ng Diyos ay panandalian lamang — na sumisira sa lahat ng doktrina.

5.8 Ang Lohikal na Palagian (Consistency)

Kung ang belo ay pangkultura lamang:

·        Ang pagiging permanente ng kasal (Mat. 19) ay pangkultura rin.

·        Ang katahimikan ng babae (1 Tim. 2) ay pangkultura rin.

·        Ang mismong headship (1 Cor. 11:3) ay pangkultura rin.

Ngunit walang sinomang tumatanggi sa belo na handang tanggapin ang lahat ng implikasyong ito. Ang pagpili ng aral na tatanggapin at tatanggihan ay hindi tamang pagtrato ng Kasulatan kundi mapagpili (selective) lamang.

5.9 Ang Mas Malawak na Patotoo

Ang belo ay umaayon sa mas malawak na tema ng Bibliya tungkol sa nakikitang pagtalima:

·        Si Noe na nagtayo ng arka (Gen. 6:22).

·        Ang Israel na naglagay ng dugo sa pintuan sa Paskua (Ex. 12:13).

·        Ang bautismo bilang nakikitang paglilibing at pagkabuhay kay Cristo (Rom. 6:3–4).

Lagi nang gumamit ang Diyos ng mga nakikitang gawa upang ipakita ang espirituwal na katotohanan. Ang belo ay bahagi ng pareho at tiyak na padron.

5.10 Konklusyon ng Pagtatanggol

Malinaw ang pagtatanggol para sa belo:

·        Si Adan at Eva ang pundasyon ng utos na ito.

·        Magkatulad ang paliwanag ni Jesus at ni Pablo.

·        Ang mga anghel ay saksi ng pagsamba na malayo sa kultura.

·        Ang lahat ng iglesia ay pare-parehong nagsagawa nito.

·        Nabibigo ang mga tutol mula sa feminismo, denominasyon, at mga mapangduda kapag sinukat sa Kasulatan.

Ang belo ay hindi isang relic ng kultura kundi isang buhay na patotoo ng kaayusan ng Diyos sa pagsamba.

Maaaring ibahagi, i-print, ipangaral, o i-repost ang mga artikulo dito kung hindi ito babaguhin, panananatilihin ang tema ng layunin, hindi ipagbibili o gagamitin para kumita, at may malinaw na link pabalik sa blog na ito.

#ChristianWomen #VeilInPrayer #HeadCovering #1Corinthians11 #BibleDoctrine #ChurchPractice #CreationOrder #ObedienceToGod #CristianongBabae #BeloSaPanalangin

Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Support This Work
🔙 Back to Table of Contents
Topics:

Popular posts from this blog

The Origin and Error of “Once Saved, Always Saved” (OSAS): A Biblical Exposé

English 🇵🇭 Tagalog The Origin and Error of “Once Saved, Always Saved” (OSAS) A Biblical Exposé An Authoritative Study Using the King James Bible Introduction: A Question of Eternal Security The doctrine of Once Saved, Always Saved (OSAS) asserts that once a person is saved, they can never lose their salvation, regardless of future behavior, apostasy, or rebellion. It is often linked with the phrase “eternal security” in Protestant theology. This study examines the origin, evaluates the biblical claims, and provides a full refutation using only the Scripture as the final and only authority. I. Historical Roots of OSAS (A Brief Context) Though many today assume OSAS to be an apostolic doctrine, its systematized form arose from John Calvin's doctrine of Perseverance of the Saints (TULIP), later popularized by Baptist theologians like Charles Stanley and modern evangelical churches. However, early church fathers such as Tertullian, Orige...
Read more

The Promise and Importance of Christ’s Church

English 🇵🇭 Tagalog     Next ⟶ The Promise and Importance of Christ’s Church "And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it." — Matthew 16:18 (KJV) Introduction The Church of Christ is not a product of human invention or denominational evolution. It is the fulfillment of a divine promise — a structure built not by human hands, but by the Lord Himself. In a time when religious confusion is widespread and thousands of conflicting churches exist, we must return to the simple, authoritative statement of Jesus: “I will build my church.” (Matt. 16:18) These words mark the beginning of a divine blueprint. This was not a vague intention, nor a mystical concept. Jesus was referring to a real, identifiable, and traceable body of people — the church — that He Himself would build, own, and preserve. “I Will Build My Church” — A Divine Dec...
Read more

Grace, Faith, and Works

English 🇵🇭 Tagalog Grace, Faith, And Works A Biblical Exegesis Of Ephesians 2:8–10 “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.” – Ephesians 2:8–10 I. Introduction: Why This Study Matters Now More Than Ever In a religious world increasingly divided by theological confusion and denominational doctrines, few passages are more quoted yet more misunderstood than Ephesians 2:8–10 : “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.” While this passage declares foundational truths about salvation, it has been misappropria...
Read more

Restoration Movement: The Illusion of Rebuilding What God Preserved

English 🇵🇭 Tagalog There Is Nothing to Restore — Just Preach the Gospel A Doctrinal Exposition Affirming the Ongoing Existence and Perfection of God’s Church Introduction In recent centuries, many sincere believers have spoken of a "restoration movement"—the idea that the true church was lost to history and must now be recovered or re-established. But is this concept biblical? Does Scripture ever indicate that the church built by Christ (Matthew 16:18) would vanish, become corrupted, and need a future restoration? The answer, as revealed in the inspired Word of God, is  no . What God  planned before the foundation of the world  (Ephesians 3:9–11), what Christ  purchased with His own blood  (Acts 20:28), and what was  established in power on Pentecost  (Acts 2),  continues to exist today . While men may depart from the truth, the truth remains. And what we are called to do is not to restore, but to  pre...
Read more

The Church Built By Jesus Christ In The New testament - Lesson 1

English 🇵🇭 Tagalog ⟵ Previous Next ⟶ Lesson 1: The Church Planned by God Before the Creation of the Universe Key Passage: Ephesians 3:9–11 “ And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ: To the intent that now unto the principalities and powers in heavenly places might be known by the church the manifold wisdom of God, According to the eternal purpose which he purposed in Christ Jesus our Lord: ” Introduction The concept of the church is often misunderstood—even among believers. To many, it appears to be an afterthought, a temporary institution until Christ returns, or merely a human denomination among many. But the Scriptures teach otherwise. The church was not an accident. It was not a substitute for a failed plan. It was not an invention of man. It was part of God's eternal purpose , rooted i...
Read more

The Deathblow to OSAS

English 🇵🇭 Tagalog Romans 6:1-2 — The Deathblow to OSAS with One Simple Question "What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein? - Romans 6:1-2 Can You Keep Sinning and Still Be Saved? Paul Says: Absolutely Not! Some claim, “Once Saved, Always Saved” (OSAS)—but what if one simple question from Paul demolishes that doctrine entirely? In  Romans 6:1-2 , the apostle confronts the dangerous logic that grace gives license to sin. His answer is sharp, unshakable, and Spirit-inspired. This short but powerful passage doesn’t just challenge OSAS—it delivers the deathblow. Ready to face the truth? Q: Who is speaking in Romans 6:1? A:  The apostle  Paul —a faithful Christian, divinely inspired. Q: Who does the word "we" refer to? A:  To  Paul and other Christians . Those already  saved ,  baptized , and  wal...
Read more

“And Such Were Some of You”: A Scriptural Mandate for Total Transformation

English 🇵🇭 Tagalog Doctrinal Refutation of LGBTQ+ in Light of 1 Corinthians 6:9–11 “Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.” (1Cor. 6:9-11) I. INTRODUCTION: The Most Critical Battle for the Soul of the Church In the face of a growing movement that seeks to normalize LGBTQ+ identity within the church—arguing that “as long as they don’t practice homosexual sex, it’s acceptable”—we turn to God’s inspired Word , not cultural trends, for the truth. One prominent preacher even argues that effeminate behavior, gay gestures, and homosexual identi...
Read more